- This topic is empty.
-
Posts
-
-
In the post‑war era, many motorcycle clubs chose not to join the American Motorcyclist Association (AMA). These independent clubs were labeled “outlaws,” not because they were criminal but because they operated outside the AMA’s sanctioning rules. After incidents like the 1947 Hollister rally, the AMA responded by saying that 99 percent of riders were law‑abiding—leaving one percent to misbehave. Some clubs adopted the tongue‑in‑cheek “1%” patch to show they weren’t part of the mainstream.
Over time, a handful of outlaw clubs became involved in criminal enterprises, and law enforcement began to equate the term with illegal activity. It’s true there are about 500 outlaw motorcycle gangs worldwide with roughly 45,000 members, but they represent a tiny fraction of the millions of motorcyclists on the road. Most outlaw or independent clubs simply value freedom from outside interference and are composed of law‑abiding riders.
When discussing biker culture, it’s important to distinguish between “outlaw” as a status outside the AMA and criminal conduct. Have you ridden with or know an independent club that gets labeled unfairly? Share your experiences.
📌 Source: U.S. Department of Justice
-
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.